My car shopping experience - Toyota RAV4 Forums
Shopping and Test Drives Discuss the various issues that come into play when you are test driving, comparing and pricing the RAV4 with other SUV's.

User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
#1 (permalink) Old 11-05-2012, 02:33 AM
Senior Member
Country: bob-o's Flag is: United States
 
bob-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: central oregon
Posts: 316
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
(Thread Starter)
My car shopping experience

I am a retired engineer, and have been driving full sized American pickups for many years, mostly 4wd, and decided to buy a new smaller SUV for the times we don't need the truck. I considered the possibility that I might want to use the vehicle on occasion to tow a boat or small trailer, but that would be a relatively minor issue since I have a full sized V8 truck for long or rough trips. After some research I narrowed it down to the CR-V, RAV4, Escape, Tiguan, or several Subaru models.

Here in central Oregon we have the Cascade range and Mt. Hood, and there is a lot of snow. Subarus are everywhere you look. Our closest friends have a 2011 Forester and love it even though they have already had a blown head gasket, blown AC compressor, ongoing electrical problems, etc. I have another good friend who had the timing belt go in his almost new outback. Horror stories abound. Servicing the very complicated AWD system is expensive and good mechanics are hard to find. Subaru is the only AWD system that requires you to buy 4 new tires if you have catastrophic damage to one.

There has to be a very good reason people put up with all this. My opinion is that this is the best AWD system, but you only need it if you drive through deep UNPLOWED snow or have to climb steep, rutted, muddy roads. If you don't know how to drive in these conditions the car will still get stuck. Personally I don't need to do this badly enough to put up with all the rest. That being said, "subies" are a cult, and it is easy to drink the kool-aid and join. I would bet that at least 75% of Subarus never get into situations that require their specific attributes and a FWD system with traction control is more than adequate and much less expensive to buy and maintain.

I actually did almost drink the stuff a couple of months ago. I was all set to order the new Crosstrek, and could get one custom order in 4 wks for $500 under MSRP. This is a comfortable hatchback Impreza raised up to 8.5" clearance, same attack/departure angles as the Forester. I decided to put it off a few weeks because I didn't want to move the cash right then, and when I went back to the dealer they said 4 months and $3K OVER MSRP for this one we have in stock. I decided to take it for a test drive and was impressed with the new 2.0 engine and the CVT. I think it has enough power, in spite of what most reviewers have said, but look at what I decided to buy instead, the V6 RAV4. I might have bought that car except it had the low end seats and they were not comfortable at all.

I crossed Subaru off the list, then looked at the Tiguan and Escape. Both are turbos, and I just don't want those maintenance issues. I went to Honda and fell in love with the CR-V. On the test drive I went into a marked 25 banked corner at 50, with the salesman just a bit wide-eyed but cool. I punched out of the corner, and the CR-V traction control did its job amazingly well with no torque steer at all. Without it I'm sure the tires would have made noise and maybe fishtailed a bit. I wanted to buy it right then, but there was still the issue that maybe I could tow something with the vehicle I bought. I decided to go look at the RAV4 first.

I had researched cars online and purchased the pricing guide from Consumer Reports, so I knew exactly how much I should pay. I found only 2 V6 Ltd cars with nav within 100 miles, so I went to look at the closest one, which was just up the road from the Honda dealer. The other one is 100 miles away. When I got to the dealership it was a gleaming modern structure that looked more suitable for Mercedes than toyota, and I just didn't feel comfortable, as opposed to the more casual laid-back environment of the Honda dealer. The salesman was friendly and helpful but would not give me a price other than the sticker. When I pushed him to give me a price he went into the glass cube where the finance guys sit and came back with a piece of paper with all the financing options to pay the MSRP even though I told him I was paying cash.

I drove the car and loved the power and comfortable ride. If I want to be bounced around I will take the truck. I considered the 26 mpg claim vs the 30 mpg for the CR-V and decided I would never use the CR-V's ECO mode that limits valve timing and mixture to reduce power anyway, so I would likely never see 30. I doubt I will ever see 26 with the RAV4 but hopefully it will surprise me. It is a lot better than the 15 I get with my Silverado. The Silverado has a 350 Vortec V8 that has almost exactly the same horsepower as the RAV4 3.5 V6! (and it is about twice the weight)

So I left the dealership and went home to talk things over with my wife and let her have some say. She agreed the RAV4 was a better choice. I went to the dealership web page, found the car, and used their messaging system to tell the internet sales guy that I was happy with the way the first guy treated me but I got the feeling he did not have the authority to give me a price. I wrote that I was interested but was not coming back without a firm price. First thing Sunday morning the guy called and we agreed on a price $250 above what Consumer Reports said was the best deal I was likely to find. In truth it was the ONLY deal I was likely to find without driving 100 miles for one other.

Final Analysis: Many Subaru owners drank the kool-aid. If I lived in Vermont I would buy one for sure but if the road is not plowed here once or twice a year I will wait or take the big truck. The CR-V is a sweet, sexy ride that handles exceptionally well and does everything but haul a trailer over 1500 lbs. I understand they are rated to haul twice that in Europe where people do not sue each other as much. The V6 RAV4 is too powerful for lots of people who might buy one. I suspect that is part of the reason they are doing away with it. 0-60 in the sixes and 140 mph is not really a utility vehicle. I'm sure glad I got mine before they are all gone.

I hope this will be helpful to others who are shopping the latest crop of new small SUV's. I appreciate what I have learned from this forum and it helped me to decide on the RAV4. I just wish I could have bought it from the Honda dealer.

2012 V6 4WD Ltd.

if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
bob-o is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bob-o For This Useful Post:
earthrealm (11-05-2012), jimski (11-28-2012)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 (permalink) Old 11-05-2012, 07:26 AM
Senior Member
Country: Freedom55's Flag is: Canada
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Greater Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 381
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Very interesting story! As for me, I shopped for for 2013 Sorento, a 2012 Santa Fe and a 2012 Escape and of course a RAV4 all with cloth seats, V6 and AWD.

The Sorento drives and feel like a German car but has reduced rear visibility and low expected resale value despite it's modern look.

The Santa Fe has so so interior and it looks outdated despite good rear visibility but again low expected resale value despite good discounts; I don't like the 2013 Santa Fe, too expensive with the 2.0L turbo and poor rear visibility but it looks great in and out.

The Escape was the basement bargain deal with a $1,000 off for Costco members; I was surprised how quiet it drove and how smooth the suspension was compared to earlier models and the visibility all around is great and so are the seats. Now the bad news; their 6 speed auto tranny has one of the worst track records, the roof rack is flimsy, the inside is 1990 retro style, no storage compartments in cargo area, old fashioned fender mounted antenna, no foot rest for the driver, huge chrome grille (not my cup of tea). So in the end, it was not the bargain it seemed to be at first sight; it's not because it was the best selling SUV here that it means it's the best.

So I went for the sure bet, a RAV4 Sport which I intend to keep for 6-7 years. It has a few things I don't like but I'm getting used to them and modifying a few things myself and discovering new features every week! It's a mature design, they improved a few things over the years and the rear visibility is better than most and that full size spare is a blessing. As far as poor rear and 3/4 visibility, the winners are: Rogue, Tucson and Sportage none with a V6 but the Sportage offers a pricey 2.0L turbo. Sheetmetal must cost less than glass...The Forester is in a class of its own with green house like windows but with 4 speed auto tranny, cheap interior and a torquey but weak outdated engine unless you go for the expensive XT turbo (here in Canada only the fully loaded version is offered). Just my 2¢!

2012 Sport V6 Classic Silver no option
1999 Lexus RX300 Pearl White base gone
1972 Corolla 1200 Yellow 4 speed manual long gone
Others too many to mention!
Freedom55 is offline  
#3 (permalink) Old 11-28-2012, 01:51 PM
Member
Country: jimski's Flag is: United States
 
jimski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: White Mountains, New Hampshire
Posts: 159
Thanks: 17
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Very informative post bob-o! It makes me feel all the more certain that I made the right choice over some of those vehicles that I was also considering before purchasing my Rav. Thanks for taking the time to share your decision making process with us and why you also chose the Rav4 V-6 over the other vehicles....

2011 V-6 Limited - Pyrite Mica
2007 Harley-Davidson Street Glide
jimski is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome