Review: 2015 Toyota RAV4 proves popular doesn’t always mean better - Toyota RAV4 Forums
RAV4 News, Reviews & Videos Share your RAV4 news articles, reviews or videos here!

User Tag List

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 12-25-2014, 12:02 PM Thread Starter
Your Humble Administrator
Country: JuneBug's Flag is: United States
JuneBug's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 16,169
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1736 Post(s)
Thanks: 638
Thanked 2,457 Times in 1,783 Posts
(Thread Starter)
Review: 2015 Toyota RAV4 proves popular doesn’t always mean better

Test Drive: 2015 Toyota RAV4 - NY Daily News

With the RAV4, Toyota has built a reputation for producing a useful, reliable, and affordable 4-wheeled equivalent to a Leatherman multi-purpose tool. The latest version continues this tradition in its ongoing sales battle against rivals like the Honda CR-V, Ford Escape, and Mazda CX-5. It’s hugely popular but, as we’d discover, the RAV4 has room for improvement.

Subaru can lay claim to building the original crossover SUV*, but Toyota had a big hand in popularizing the concept when the first RAV4 debuted for the 1996 model year. Wearing an acronym for Recreational Active Vehicle with 4-Wheel Drive, the RAV4 was small, affordable, practical, and as it turned out, damn near bulletproof. Plus, its polarizing looks likely helped more than hurt. That first RAV4 stood out in a market that was still brand new.
Toyota has redesigned the RAV4 three times in the past two decades, with the latest edition debuting for the 2013 model year. It is a hugely popular small crossover SUV, thanks to a reputation for dependability, a roomy and practical interior, impressive fuel economy ratings, and affordable prices. Having now spent a week using one to shuttle my own family around the ‘burbs of Los Angeles, the question is whether the RAV4 deserves so much adoration? I’m skeptical.
Painted silver and equipped with a black cloth interior, my RAV4 XLE was about as average as it gets. At least it had the optional all-wheel-drive system, lending accuracy to its nameplate. At $27,625, it came in well below what people are spending for a new car, on average, pegging the affordability meter with a big, yellow smiley face. In addition to AWD system, this example also included Toyota’s Entune App Suite technology and a navigation system.

This year, the XLE models get a new finish for the standard aluminum wheels. This change to a Superchrome treatment might be a small thing, but it makes this crossover SUV look better. Design is always a personal preference, but I don’t find the latest edition of the RAV4 all that appealing. From the bushy gray plastic moustache on its face, to its billboard-sized tailgate and grinning back bumper, the RAV4 looks cartoonish. Give me a previous-generation model in Sport trim with a V-6 engine, please. That version was fun all day long and, in my opinion, it also looked better.
Inside, I’ve got a different story to tell. Architectural and stylish, yet elemental and functional, today’s RAV4 interior represents a leap forward in terms of the quality of materials, the level of technical sophistication, and the amount of practicality and utility. Aside from noting that the plastics used to trim the lower half of the interior are too glossy, my only gripes pertain to how much lint the black cloth seats collect, and how small the virtual buttons on the Entune infotainment system’s touch-sensing screen are.

Screen glare is also an issue with this version of Entune, especially in low winter sunlight. While I find it almost ridiculously easy to pair an iPhone to this system, I can’t figure out why Toyota restricts its Safety Connect service to the upper trim levels of its more expensive vehicles.
Safety Connect is a subscription service, but for a parent of a teenager like I am, the Automatic Collision Notification and Roadside Assistance features are invaluable. Plus, with Safety Connect, a driver can summon help with a push of a button. Great stuff, right? But no matter how much I’m willing to spend, I can’t get this on any version of the RAV4, while some competitors provide it as standard equipment. That’s a major oversight considering how important the RAV4 is in terms of Toyota’s image, along with the brand’s U.S. sales.

Back to the RAV4’s cabin, there’s plenty of room for people and cargo. The front seats are firm and supportive, and my test vehicle included a manual seat height adjuster for the front passenger, getting a big thumbs up from my wife, who likes to sit up nice and high in a vehicle. Toyota could improve comfort levels by adding a leather-wrapped steering wheel and soft upper door panel materials to the XLE model, but otherwise the front seat occupants have few complaints.
Roomy and inviting, the back seat’s bottom cushion is mounted low, so that when the seatback is folded down the resulting cargo load floor is as flat as is possible. While I understand this approach, especially in a vehicle such as this, which is sold, in part, on the strength of its utility, the result is a splay-legged posture for the longer-limbed members of the species. Kids are happy, though.

Among the biggest of the small crossovers when it comes to cargo space, the RAV4 can hold up to 38.4 cu.-ft. of cargo behind its rear seat. Loading is easy, too, thanks to a low lift over height and a rear lift-gate that rises high and out of the way. Fold the rear seats and the RAV4 swallows a generous 73.4 cu.-ft. of whatever you toss in there, or more than the cargo space of some midsize SUVs.
Don’t worry too much about loading a RAV4 with people and stuff, because the 2.5-liter engine is peppy, refined, and fuel-efficient. It makes a competitive 176-horsepower, and while the Sport driving mode makes the RAV4 feel genuinely energetic, I’m not gonna lie: I really miss the 3.5-liter V-6 engine that Toyota used to offer in the RAV4. In exchange for a small fuel economy penalty, the V-6 delivered a big improvement in acceleration.

Toyota has done a good job of calibrating the RAV4’s electric steering, though the driver can detect occasional traces of artifice. The brakes are excellent as this crossover comes to a smooth, clean stop every time. Suspension tuning is taut, giving the RAV4 a connected and athletic feel from behind the wheel. Ultimately, what reigns in the fun are the P225/65R17 Michelin Latitude tires, which provide relatively low cornering grip. Combined with more body roll than might be expected, this choice in rubber prevents the RAV4 from demonstrating the kind of tossability that puts a smile on a driver’s face.
Despite its name and available AWD, you won’t want to go very far off pavement in a RAV4. Just 6.3 inches of ground clearance exists, compared to 8.7 inches for a Subaru Outback, or the RAV4’s more direct competitor from that automaker, the versatile Forester. Those Subarus will get you farther off the beaten path, and through deeper snow than the RAV4. The Forester also offers more overall cargo room than the Toyota.

Another notch in Subaru’s belt pertains to safety. In crash tests conducted by the Federal government, the Forester and the Outback earn 5-star overall ratings, while the RAV4 gets a 4-star rating. Plus, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) gives the Forester and Outback a “Top Safety Pick” laurel combined with a Superior crash-prevention rating. Meanwhile, last year’s RAV4 earned a “Poor” rating in the small overlap frontal-impact test, and is ineligible for a crash-prevention rating.
While it is possible that Toyota has made unannounced changes to improve its IIHS crash-test performance – official ratings for the 2015 model are forthcoming as this review is written – it’s clear that the automaker has some work to do in this regard. Right now, this Toyota appears to be selling in big numbers based on the strength of its historical reputation for durability and economy.

* The 1975 Subaru 4x4 station wagon, which had a raised suspension, became the official car of the U.S. Ski Team in 1976 and, ultimately, became the modern Subaru Outback.

Help RAV4World members help you by providing your car's operating location in your profile page. Climate can cause a RAV4 in Dallas Wisconsin to experience a different set of issues when compared to the same model in Dallas Texas.

2008 Limited V6 2WD "The Silver Bullet"

JuneBug is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 12-25-2014, 12:15 PM
Advanced Member
Country: Blogson's Flag is: Wales
Blogson's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Oregon Coast USA
Posts: 7,691
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 906 Post(s)
Thanks: 194
Thanked 690 Times in 650 Posts
Combining the reviewer's plusses and minuses, the 2015 RAV seems to be somewhere in the average range compared with the reviewer's hinted preference for Subaru's Forester and Outback.

2011 Upgraded Base V6 4WD
2007 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Classic LT
2002 Craftsman LT1000 V2

Jesus is Lord
Blogson is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-03-2015, 04:32 PM
Junior Member
Country: Rav4MPG's Flag is: United States
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have to admit I prefer the Subaru's styling as I prefer a more rugged, traditional SUV to the modern sculpted crossover. The Forester, in particular, maintains a manual transmission and the boxy rear providing great visibility. It is a shame the Subaru's are suffering from the oil consumption issue (Google it), otherwise I would own one. I wish Toyota, Ford, Honda or another reliable manufacturer would reintroduce a more rugged offload-oriented compact SUV. It seems that Jeep and Subaru are the only game left in town and both have quality issues keeping me away.
Rav4MPG is offline  
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 02-18-2015, 11:54 PM
Junior Member
Country: mvierra1's Flag is: United States
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ca
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 2013 Rav4 limited, and have been very pleased with the car. My first choice [U]was[U] the Subaru until I test drove two of the models. The Rav4 was better all around. My 2014 Tundra double cab limited is better than the "big" three that I looked at as well. I was a Ford person till that 2013 Rav4. Toyota has converted me over.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0006.jpg (257.0 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0016.jpg (375.2 KB, 34 views)
mvierra1 is offline  
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome