Toyota RAV4 Forums banner
1 - 20 of 91 Posts

Traveling

· Registered
Joined
·
310 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 · (Edited)
Initial Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2’

Here are my two-week-in thoughts. I am comparing them to the Yokohama Avid GTs that came with our R4P. As we have an XSE, our tires are 235/55/19’s.

Advantages: Yokohama Avid GT’:

  1. A small amount quieter: Not much but a little amount. The Michelins have a tiny bit of what TireRack calls is white noise. TireRack does not find that white noise objectionable in the slightest; neither do I — especially since my wife and I find our R4P’s with its laminated front door glass to be a fairly quiet vehicle.
  2. Better fuel mileage: Impossible for me to tell how much so but my initial guess (purely that) is that my 42 mile all electric range just dropped to around perhaps 41 or 40 miles. ICE MPG drops too; again a guess, perhaps being reduced by about a 1/2 to 1 mile per gallon. Yet, the CC 2 tires are part of Michelin’s “green family” of tires, so only time will tell. But if that kind of a reduction, would that be important? Each of us will have to decide that for themselves.
Neutral: Dependent On Personal Preference/Priorities:

1.Front tire spinning is less as the Michelins hook up better. IF you enjoy spinning your front tires, this could be a negative for you. If you like better acceleration, more efficient use of the car’s power with that same amount of power getting better tire pavement grip, perhaps the Michelins would reduce Car and Driver’s R4P obtained 0 to 60 time from 5.4 seconds to 5.3 seconds.
  1. Vehicle “roll” when cornering. This was not changed due to the tire change (the weight has to go somewhere given the suspension, steering, and other components Toyota created for it).
Advantages: Michelin CrossClimate 2s:
  1. Acceleration is better due to less tire spin on dry pavement. There is even less Michelin tire spinning comparatively when the pavement is wet. This latter difference is considerable IMO; independent tire testers have commented on good the CC 2s are in the wet.
  2. Most importantly to me, for my only initial complaint about our new R4P is that steering precision with the Avid GTs was poor (something noted in many auto-media written and video reviewers and by many of you). Whereas IMO that Avid GT steering wheel “play” was about 1/4” without any change in direction even on a straight, smooth, flat road, it seems as if this has been reduced 50% with our new tires e.g, resulting in more-enjoyable, more-precise steering with the CC 2s. The one place I notice it in the most positively was at the same speed for both tires, was the with the Avid GTs the R4P wandered outwardly during a significant curve — toward the outer edge of the pavement, especially by the time you were 3/4 of the way through that curve. However now when I concentrate fully with the CC 2s on the same dry pavement, I am now able to take a serious curve at a moderate speed as the new tires “take a set” and kept the vehicle in the center of the lane when I wanted it that way; or if I wished to take corners differently, instead taking thar corner “sports car style” of clipping the apex and deliberately, progressively unwinding the steering toward the end of that curve. In either case the CCs were more steering precise. Today I realized that on a straight good road with almost no other vehicles around me, I was relaxedly driving with one hand on the wheel.
  3. As a result of enhanced steering feel, I am liking its handling more. It “carves” corners more precisely — but again it is not, nor will never be a sports car. If you precision drive your car and set it up correctly at the beginning of a curve, it will stay where you are wanting it to throughout the whole curve unless you are of course going too fast for conditions.
  4. Tire wear: Again no ability for me to personally determine, but the CC 2s have a 640 UTQG mileage rating compared to the Avid GTs 280.
  5. The CC 2’s are severe snow (three mountain peak) rated; the Avid GTs sure are not.
Independent Reviews:

Testing done by both TireRack.com and Jason Fenske (aka “Engineering Explained,”) both conclude that the Michelin CrossClimate 2s are really good tires for SUV. If you do not yet know Jason’s YT channel, he is one of the professional car reviewers — and also a career automotive engineer. Here’s Jason’s review of the Michelin CC 2s, tires he bought with his own money for his own vehicle after his prior comparative tire research:


My Summary Based On Early Driving:

I am very happy I made the tire change. This mod improved the R4P quite a bit in my opinion. It was worth $850 to me (all in) to start again with much better and safer tires than what came with the vehicle. Being able to take corners at a “moderate plus” or faster speed and not be concerned as to whether we will now stay in our lane, always results in a more relaxing, more fun drive.

160401
160402


As always, opinions can vary.

IMO, the CrossClimate 2s also look better lol.
 
The Michelin's have a look of the old Goodyear AquaTreads except there is no noticeable groove down the center line of the tire.

Thank you for the review. I also have stock 19" Yokohama's and have been thinking about Michelins once the OEMs wear out.
 
Discussion starter · #5 · (Edited)
I took off the rear tires to put on the mud flaps but that was a complete waste of my time. Here’s how I would do it if starting from scratch.

First, i would do the front mud flaps by turning the wheels sequentially. Nothing to drill; takes about 12 minutes for each one if you totally take your time. The Toyota set of four comes with all needed nuts, screws, clips, etc.

Regarding the rears next:

Take a flat head screwdriver and pop off the upper snap clip. Use a 10 mm and remove the one bolt that faces straight downward (there is room to get underneath without any jacks or driving on any ramp and to look upward). Put on the mud flap on by replacing the upper snap clip. Looking up from underneath, put in the 10mm bolt you just took out. Tighten it 90%.

Then, and this is what I would do differently (no need for tire removal nor pre-drilling into the two places where the factory mud flaps have existing 1/8” diameter, pre-drilled holes). take a small Phillips head screwdriver and punch it into those two factory mud flaps pre-drilled mud flap holes on each side; the screwdriver will easily cut into and through the car’s vertical plastic part. Remove the upper snap clip and the 10 mm bolt; place the provided “U” shaped black metal clip onto the vertical part (it’s inner edge), so its hole is exactly where you have punched your new hole. Starting at the top, put it together for the last time by installing that top snap clip for the last time. Then put in the 10mm bolt from underneath; then screw in the provided flat-head screws with integral washers into the factory two mud flap holes. Then, lastly, put it together including the fifth/final attacking method, e.g., the inner car’s underneath pre-existing, screw receiving, female location; it is a couple of inches inboard of the where the 10 mm bolt is.

Instead of my wasting about an extra 30 minute per side with rear tire removal, I would estimate that each side’s rear mud flap is now 15 minute as IF you take it very slow and methodically.
 
Did you put the mudguards on while the tires were off? I agree, much better looking especially with the tire gloss. Any tire with the word Michelin makes me happy.
What tire pressures are you running? I wonder if the mold release has anything to do with initial sound (quietness) or handling. I believe you will eventually see the same EV numbers after the tires break in and are less stiff as in new. Looking forward to a follow up in a year or so of total performance.
 
I took off the rear tires to put on the mud flaps but that was a complete waste of my time. Here’s how I would do it if starting from scratch.

First, i would do the front mud flaps by turning the wheels sequentially. Nothing to drill; takes about 12 minutes for each one if you totally take your time. The Toyota set of four comes with all needed nuts, screws, clips, etc.

Regarding the rears next:

Take a flat head screwdriver and pop off the upper snap clip. Use a 10 mm and remove the one bolt that faces straight downward (there is room to get underneath without any jacks or driving on any ramp and to look upward). Put on the mud flap on by replacing the upper snap clip. Looking up from underneath, put in the 10mm bolt you just took out. Tighten it 90%.

Then, and this is what I would do differently (no need for tire removal nor pre-drilling into the two places where the factory mud flaps have existing 1/8” diameter, pre-drilled holes). take a small Phillips head screwdriver and punch it into those two factory mud flaps pre-drilled mud flap holes on each side; the screwdriver will easily cut into and through the car’s vertical plastic part. Remove the upper snap clip and the 10 mm bolt; place the provided “U” shaped black metal clip onto the vertical part (it’s inner edge), so its hole is exactly where you have punched your new hole. Starting at the top, put it together for the last time by installing that top snap clip for the last time. Then put in the 10mm bolt from underneath; then screw in the provided flat-head screws with integral washers into the factory two mud flap holes. Then, lastly, put it together including the fifth/final attacking method, e.g., the inner car’s underneath pre-existing, screw receiving, female location; it is a couple of inches inboard of the where the 10 mm bolt is.

Instead of my wasting about an extra 30 minute per side with rear tire removal, I would estimate that each side’s rear mud flap is now 15 minute as IF you take it very slow and methodically.
Interesting that you figured this out too. With a stubby the rears weren't that big a deal. If only the Japanese instructions could be worded in English we understood, and actually were logical.
 
This should be useful info to your question about the Continental Cross Contact LX 25’s.
[/URL]

I went with the CrossClimate 2’s as C.
This should be useful info to your question about the Continental Cross Contact LX 25’s.

I went with the CrossClimate 2’s as I wanted the three mountain snowflake rating.
This almost sounds like a ski trip in central Oregon with three Gen X,Y and Zers.
 
This almost sounds like a ski trip in central Oregon with three Gen X,Y and Zers.
I guess the Michelin's are better in snow and track driving. Pirelli and Continental seems at least comparable if not better in other categories.
I think I'd rather spend $100 less and get a longer lasting, quieter tire for every day driving.
I don't see where Jason Fenske ever reviewed tires other than the Michelin.
Just looking for feedback from anyone whore tried the Continental of Pirelli's
 
A consideration when replacing tires is that initially all tires have a higher rolling resistance that disappears as the tire is broken in. This is especially noticeable with BEV or PHEV vehicles. Tire noise is also higher until the tread is broken in.

Personally I have been driving with Michelin tires for many years and they have always performed extremely well. I am looking forward to the day that i can replace the OEM Yokohama tires with Michelin. All my other vehicles have Michelin tires, and the tire life, handling performance, noise, and reliability are top notch.
 
Just purchased a set of Michelin Cross Climate 2 tires for my daughter's Camry Hybrid. She has been running two sets of wheels (summer and winter sets) in MN but will be moving to a different state. Given that I can't swap the wheels for her, we decided to go with the Cross Climate 2 and adjust if required. One of the issues with the Cross Climate 2 is noticeable drop in the MPG.


We currently have 2019 RAV4 LE, 2020 RAV4H XSE and will be acquiring 2021 RAV4P SE in June. We drive 2019 and 2020 with dedicated Michelin xice SUV wheels from Nov through Mar. I am not crazy about the OEM Dunlop tires on our XSE and about to come with Prime SE. I am planning to run dedicated a set of 17" (235 65 17) Michelin xice SUV winter tires on Prime. When these Dunlops wear out (4/32" or less), I am planning to buy Michelin Defenders for RAV4H XSE and RAV4P SE given minimal MPG degradation and tread longevity.

If I were to run only one set of tires per car then the Cross Climate would be my top choice. But I have more choices with running two sets of wheels.
 
Just purchased a set of Michelin Cross Climate 2 tires for my daughter's Camry Hybrid. She has been running two sets of wheels (summer and winter sets) in MN but will be moving to a different state. Given that I can't swap the wheels for her, we decided to go with the Cross Climate 2 and adjust if required. One of the issues with the Cross Climate 2 is noticeable drop in the MPG.


We currently have 2019 RAV4 LE, 2020 RAV4H XSE and will be acquiring 2021 RAV4P SE in June. We drive 2019 and 2020 with dedicated Michelin xice SUV wheels from Nov through Mar. I am not crazy about the OEM Dunlop tires on our XSE and about to come with Prime SE. I am planning to run dedicated a set of 17" (235 65 17) Michelin xice SUV winter tires on Prime. When these Dunlops wear out (4/32" or less), I am planning to buy Michelin Defenders for RAV4H XSE and RAV4P SE given minimal MPG degradation and tread longevity.

If I were to run only one set of tires per car then the Cross Climate would be my top choice. But I have more choices with running two sets of wheels.
When you say "noticeable drop," is that 1 or 2 MPG or like 5 MPG? And is this summer to summer, since winter with the RAV4H saw a noticeable (6 MPG) drop for me.
 
When you say "noticeable drop," is that 1 or 2 MPG or like 5 MPG? And is this summer to summer, since winter with the RAV4H saw a noticeable (6 MPG) drop for me.
Down 5 to 10% so 2-4 MPG decrease. I had similar issue when I went from Michelin Defenders to Primere. If you read the reviews from TireRack, my observation is consistent with other drivers. Cross Climate is good stuff but don't expect it to be perfect. There are trade offs - e.g., true all season traction vs. MPG and white noise
 
Discussion starter · #20 ·
With our XSE we find the Michelin CrossClimate 2’s to be very quiet. The superbly better handling is well worth it.

As to range/mileage: I have not tracked our electric mile range since the CC 2 install five months ago but we are still getting over 42 MPG when using gasoline (that I track very closely) so our “drop” is very small if at all.
 
1 - 20 of 91 Posts