Toyota RAV4 Forums banner
21 - 39 of 39 Posts
The chances that someone rear ends you in a parkinglot or any other minor incidents resulting in scratches or minor dents are way bigger then being rear ended to a point that you have structural damage……so my hitch stays on.
Me and my buddy leave our bike racks (1-up) on at all times. He was rear-ended by a Tesla recently while waiting to turn left at a signal. Did $15k damage to Tesla front end and just tweaked his rack a LITTLE 👍. I’m sold.
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
I was thinking of putting a bike rack behind my Rav4. The city I live in in going crazy with photo radar cameras.
They are preset to 3km over the posted limit. the tickets aren't expensive like $40- $45 to start but no demerit points.
But everyone is getting 2-3 per month. No one is changing their driving habits but I feel that 3km over the posted limit is exaggerated on the cities behalf. So simple fix is driving with a bike rack and no more photo Radar tickets. Rack pays for itself in 1 month. lol
 
What are you relying on AAA to do for you, bring you a spare tire?
Tow me on a flat bed truck :p
So simple fix is driving with a bike rack and no more photo Radar tickets.
Next thing they will ticket you for driving around with bike racks attached. They want those money!
I hope people there will realize the solution is to vote those people out of their jobs.
 
Just wondering if anyone is like me and keep their hitch receiver in all the time even when not towing anything?
The way I see is it keeps special people from parking too close or boxing me in, and in the event of an accident it would provide some impact protection.

Just curious
Where I live and they routinely salt the roads in the winter, they will rust in place and become almost impossible to remove.......coming from someone who learned the hard way!
 
In many countries an additional license plate and even rear lighting is compulsory if the bike rack obscures the original lighting and license plate.
I had to sweet talk a reluctant sign company to make a copy of my plate for when I have my cargo rack slid into my hitch. When the rack is loaded up you can’t see the cars plate. I fasten the duplicate plate to the back of the rack with bolts and nylock nuts, and also added lights wired to the trailer connector. A cop friend said the copied plate isn’t legal, but probably would not be an issue unless one was doing something else that provoked attention. Moving the real plate would be a pain and increase the chance of loss by contact with a steep driveway or some other mishap. Look at most utility or boat trailers and see how beat up the plates get. I’ve lost several trailer plates over the years, I suspect a rack plate ultimately would suffer a similar demise.
 
Until I sold it last year we had a 1988 For Ranger pickup that I just left the tow ball on all the time (why not right?)
Of course she just talked her way right out of the ticket but after that I decided to remove it.
I'm not near cute or engaging enough to get away this that kind of stuff.
Up to you but they can write you up for it and I have it on good authority that it REALLY hurts if you bang shin into it hard enough.
 
The car's bumper is homologated by DOT as is.

Anything protruding "out" past the bumper line is, IMHO, a liability in case of an accident. The claim can be made that you made worse damages, by unapproved modifications.
On small fender-benders an argument can be made that, if the hitch was not installed, the contact between cars would not had happened.

Note that all the hitch receivers are not passing the bumper line. For a reason...
I am not keeping anything in my receiver.
I see your point. I am considering getting an OEM hitch and using a bumper step with brake light. I think the bumper step solves three issues. 1st, I think the Gen 5 Rav needs more brake lighting in the back, second, the step will help when I wash the car's roof, and third it will provide some protection from rear bumper dings.

I am considering the OEM hitch for a rear recovery point, a possible hitch box for occasional use, and a possible ultra-light trailer.

The laws where I live pretty much state that anyone that hits someone in the rear is at fault. I see your point that aftermarket, protruding devices may transfer some liability my way. Thanks for pointing out the negatives of a hitch step. Other negatives I am reading are that all of the force of a crash will go the hitch mounting bolts instead of the entire bumper if a metal bumper step is installed, possibly causing more damage from a rear end crash. Possibly this is the reason WeatherTech makes a bumper step out of a resin? This version may be worth considering as it will stop small hits but crumble under larger hits not causing extra damage on the other car and allow the bumper to do its job?

Probably a moot point as most crashes will total the car anyway.
 
The laws where I live pretty much state that anyone that hits someone in the rear is at fault.
That's not always true here.
I hit somebody in the rear, but I had it on video that he cut me off very close and then braked immediately.
Initially the insurance said it was my fault, but I got the police report that said that I was "victim" and insurance agreed to that.
A lawyer for the other person can even claim that your extension past the bumper line was not DOT approved, illegal for use on public roads, and it might win. You never know how those end up. Personally, I don't want to learn a lesson when my car is totaled, so I keep my receiver empty. Everyone does whatever they think best.

And yes, a minor crash that would be absorbed by the bumper, when hit in the ball carrier could transfer directly to the frame and do more damage. Again, the insurance might try to deny that claim because "unapproved changes to the vehicle". Especially if the receiver is non-OE.
What about those with a fixed hitch ?
There is a reason why in US all the receivers allow removing of the ball carriers and they stop at the bumper line. Bumpers are required by federal law and approved for road usage when car is homologated.
The "Vlad ČšepeČ™" impaling devices are not DOT approved :p

PS: That sounds like "Tzepesh"
 
That's not always true here.
I hit somebody in the rear, but I had it on video that he cut me off very close and then braked immediately.
Initially the insurance said it was my fault, but I got the police report that said that I was "victim" and insurance agreed to that.
A lawyer for the other person can even claim that your extension past the bumper line was not DOT approved, illegal for use on public roads, and it might win. You never know how those end up. Personally, I don't want to learn a lesson when my car is totaled, so I keep my receiver empty. Everyone does whatever they think best.
When we lived in SoCal there were rings of people who deliberately cut right in front of other drivers, braked hard, and caused crashes. Then those attempted to get large settlements for alleged damage and injuries.:Law enforcement and insurance companies became aware of the scams and often used victims' dash camera evidence and then counter sued. That generally put an end to the scams.

Our trailer hitch comes off when not being used, less weight increases fuel mileage and not having the hitch weight in the rear improves handling a lot on our narrow twisty mountain roads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoNic67
cut right in front of other drivers, braked hard, and caused crashes
This was at a line of cars merging to exit the main road to highway, morning rush hour. He bypassed the line of stupid people (like me), and thought that he can jam his SUV in the small space in front of my car (an older Mercury Sable).
The guy behind me swerved right to avoid and blew a tire on the curb.
I fixed that car front (junkyard parts), and had leftover money, with his insurance money.
 
21 - 39 of 39 Posts