Toyota RAV4 Forums banner
21 - 40 of 62 Posts
Someone has posted a couple of times that they're getting 50+ MPG in the mountains. I have troubles understanding how this could actually work, meaning it doesn't makes sense to me. Are you getting this kind of MPG in the mountains? The charging, storing, and re-use of the stored energy has some efficiency loss so I can't see how a 50% climb and 50% descend (for example) is netting that kind of mileage. What I could believe is if the net terrain is more descend that climb with that reported mileage (60% descend and 40% climb).
My Corolla hybrid used as little as 3.3 l/100km in the mountains. Similar speeds on flats would have been at least 4 l/100km or more. I've thought about it and think it comes down to the peak efficiency of the engine (over 40%!) which is at around 2500-3000 rpm and at moderate power. In the mountains the engine seems to be in this optimal power band almost all the time it's running. And while it's running it's converting fuel into potential energy as the vehicle gains altitude. Come downhill, the engine can turn off and the vehicle goes quite far with that extremely efficiently generated potential energy. Meanwhile on flats, the engine needs to be running almost constantly since there is no stored potential energy to help move the vehicle, but as the power requirement is now very light the engine only runs at around 1500 RPM and and thus at much lower efficiency (something like 25-30% iirc).

I wonder if Toyota could improve the efficiency by running the engine at 2500 rpm and medium power even on flats, and storing the excess energy in the battery pack, or if the charge and discharge losses make this unviable. I think one reason they don't do this is the engine gets somewhat noisy in that optimal power band and drivers might not like it even if it was a bit more efficient.
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
I wonder if Toyota could improve the efficiency by running the engine at 2500 rpm and medium power even on flats, and storing the excess energy in the battery pack, or if the charge and discharge losses make this unviable. I think one reason they don't do this is the engine gets somewhat noisy in that optimal power band and drivers might not like it even if it was a bit more efficient.
My Rav hybrid does some of what you describe. In steady state power situations, I can see the power display showing the engine charging the battery, then switching after 20-30 seconds to a slightly softer engine tone but at the same RPM but now with the battery providing partial power. Toyota has published a graph showing thermodynamic efficiency of the Atkinson engone and it should be relatively simple to produce an efficiency curve for energy going into and out of the battery (and possibly a diferent curve for lithium versus NiMH). By combining the two, Toyota can pretty much know the peak efficient mode of operation for any required power level, and then it's just a matter of making that happen taking into account battery charge levels and all the other system sensors. Not a trivial process by any means but seems doable given enough resources which Toyota definitely has.
 
In steady state power situations, I can see the power display showing the engine charging the battery, then switching after 20-30 seconds to a slightly softer engine tone but at the same RPM but now with the battery providing partial power.
In case you haven't figured this out yet, a bit of a 'cheat' to get the Rav4 to start using the battery is to accelerate a bit past where you want to be for speed and let up the gas pedal and drop down in speed. Talking 2-3 mph here, between 30-60 mph or so. This will often 'kick in' the battery right away, not after 20-30 seconds.
 
Discussion starter · #25 ·
In case you haven't figured this out yet, a bit of a 'cheat' to get the Rav4 to start using the battery is to accelerate a bit past where you want to be for speed and let up the gas pedal and drop down in speed. Talking 2-3 mph here, between 30-60 mph or so. This will often 'kick in' the battery right away, not after 20-30 seconds.
Thanks! I did figure that out early on.

But what I was talking about is a situation where the battery is insufficient to propel the Rav, like going 45 MPH on a slight uphill. There the gas engine never shuts off but with a sready throttle position, it seems to maintain a steady RPM but the engine tone softens and becomes a bit more gruff as the MID shows the battery cycling between propelling the front wheels and being charged ny the gas engine.
 
My Rav hybrid does some of what you describe. In steady state power situations, I can see the power display showing the engine charging the battery, then switching after 20-30 seconds to a slightly softer engine tone but at the same RPM but now with the battery providing partial power. Toyota has published a graph showing thermodynamic efficiency of the Atkinson engone and it should be relatively simple to produce an efficiency curve for energy going into and out of the battery (and possibly a diferent curve for lithium versus NiMH). By combining the two, Toyota can pretty much know the peak efficient mode of operation for any required power level, and then it's just a matter of making that happen taking into account battery charge levels and all the other system sensors. Not a trivial process by any means but seems doable given enough resources which Toyota definitely has.
Yeah, the hybrids are already doing this to a degree for sure. I'm just wondering if they could squeeze out even more fuel efficiency by going all-in and really running that engine at or close to optimal load only. I've attached the BSFC chart for the A25A-FKS (close enough to A25A-FXS) below. Lower numbers inside the chart mean less fuel used per unit of power generated. I think the chart makes it quite obvious why an engine tackling steep uphills at 2500 RPM and high power requirement and then turning off for downhills is able to outdo the economy of an engine moving the vehicle on flats at steady 1500 RPM and low power.

Image
 
Yeah, the hybrids are already doing this to a degree for sure. I'm just wondering if they could squeeze out even more fuel efficiency by going all-in and really running that engine at or close to optimal load only. I've attached the BSFC chart for the A25A-FKS (close enough to A25A-FXS) below. Lower numbers inside the chart mean less fuel used per unit of power generated. I think the chart makes it quite obvious why an engine tackling steep uphills at 2500 RPM and high power requirement and then turning off for downhills is able to outdo the economy of an engine moving the vehicle on flats at steady 1500 RPM and low power.

View attachment 198868
This video should clear this up for you. The hybrid system strives to keep the engine operating the peak efficiency region.

Edit: This chart shows up at around 23 minutes, but I would recommend watching the whole video.

 
This video should clear this up for you. The hybrid system strives to keep the engine operating the peak efficiency region.

Edit: This chart shows up at around 23 minutes, but I would recommend watching the whole video.

Thanks, I've watched this video a few times previously and think I understand the system quite well. What I'm saying is, clearly the hybrid system is not always keeping the engine in the peak-efficiency area of the chart (or turning the engine off). That's not saying that the car is not operating as as efficiently as possible as a whole. Still, as observed in hilly terrain, operating the engine solely in that high-efficiency band leads to extremely low fuel consumption.
 
Thanks, I've watched this video a few times previously and think I understand the system quite well. What I'm saying is, clearly the hybrid system is not always keeping the engine in the peak-efficiency area of the chart (or turning the engine off). That's not saying that the car is not operating as as efficiently as possible as a whole. Still, as observed in hilly terrain, operating the engine solely in that high-efficiency band leads to extremely low fuel consumption.
There are too many external influences that impact the performance of the system. When the system is operating, it determines when to charge/discharge the battery but can make wrong choices. It can top off the battery just before the terrain switches to downhill, then be unable to benefit from the regenerative breaking. The built in navigation system is tightly coupled to the hybrid system and has a feature called Predictive Efficient Driving. This system learns your driving and marks areas where you always get regenerative breaking or always use EV mode. It then uses this information to guide the hybrid system, but only when you have a destination entered. Folks have reported up to 10% performance improvement.
 
What I'm saying is, clearly the hybrid system is not always keeping the engine in the peak-efficiency area of the chart (or turning the engine off)
You forget that it may not be desirable to run the ICE at peak efficiency all the time. When going up a steep hill, you may need more power to maintain speed, thus the ICE must raise RPM which will take it out of the peak efficiency area. ( HP = torque x RPM). If you stayed at the peak efficiency region, the car would slow down doing up a hill due to insufficient HP. Nobody is going to put up with that.

I think the car's computer does a marvelous job at trying to get the most MPG under the conditions demanded by the driver.
 
You forget that it may not be desirable to run the ICE at peak efficiency all the time. When going up a steep hill, you may need more power to maintain speed, thus the ICE must raise RPM which will take it out of the peak efficiency area. ( HP = torque x RPM). If you stayed at the peak efficiency region, the car would slow down doing up a hill due to insufficient HP. Nobody is going to put up with that.

I think the car's computer does a marvelous job at trying to get the most MPG under the conditions demanded by the driver.
The hope is that there are enough times when there is extra power available while maintaining the ICE within the efficiency band to charge the battery, and there is enough charge in the battery to provide the needed extra power without needed to exceed the efficiency band.

But, as you stared, there will be times where there is a longer climb that depletes the battery and the ICE must provide all the power needed, regardless of the efficiency band. Undulating hills could be ideal, while an extended continuous steep climb would be bad (for efficiency).
 
  • Like
Reactions: primer
Regarding the possibility of overcharging the battery, I'm sure it's possible to go above the normal maximum charge level under certain circumstances. But you will never get into a damaging area because the Battery Management System controls and communicates the current maximum level of charge it will take. The EV system will first try to safely burn up the excess current that the battery can't take (coolant heaters?). Sounds like the engine will turn on and use compression braking. Eventually, the EV system will freewheel rather than keep charging the battery. That just means you have to use your friction brakes like a powershift transmission driver would. All else fails, the car is set up to damage the cheapest component to replace before doing anything else. And that would not be the HV battery. Also, the car is fully aware it's on a slope. So that goes into the decisions it's making. Whether it also knows slope and distance from the map system is another thing. I doubt Toyota has gone that far with it.
 
Discussion starter · #33 ·
It seems that Toyota has done a very good job of finding the middle ground between maximizing fuel efficiency and minimizing NVH. I'm sure there are some small gains still available by optimizing the operating parameters with the curent hardware.

I feel there may be more potential gain by slightly increasing the hybrid battery size. Even moderate deceleration pushes the charge indicator to the maximum on the gauge so the assumption is that more deceleration uses the mechanical brakes. And in my driving ghere are many times when the amount of acceleration needed is just over the threshold capability of the battery, causing the gas engine to come on for just a few seconds. In the city, that happens what feels like at least a quarter of the time in my driving.

I seriously doubt I would violate my warranty by playing with the battery pack, but this sounds intriguing:


I'm not even sure this company is still in business, but a plug and play solution for my NiMH battery using lithium chemistry, with greater capacity that provides better performance, is exactly what I'd be interested in. Just knowing it is possible is great.
 
Discussion starter · #34 ·
Regarding the possibility of overcharging the battery, I'm sure it's possible to go above the normal maximum charge level under certain circumstances. But you will never get into a damaging area because the Battery Management System controls and communicates the current maximum level of charge it will take. The EV system will first try to safely burn up the excess current that the battery can't take (coolant heaters?). Sounds like the engine will turn on and use compression braking. Eventually, the EV system will freewheel rather than keep charging the battery. That just means you have to use your friction brakes like a powershift transmission driver would. All else fails, the car is set up to damage the cheapest component to replace before doing anything else. And that would not be the HV battery. Also, the car is fully aware it's on a slope. So that goes into the decisions it's making. Whether it also knows slope and distance from the map system is another thing. I doubt Toyota has gone that far with it.
At least in my XLE where there is no built in navigation, unless Android Auto is feeding route elevation information to the car and it is taking advantage of that, the engine/transmission control system us doing its usual thing trying to manage efficiency basically in a bubble.

It is interesting though that the MID shows charge continuing to go to the battery well after it is "full". Yesterday, we had one last opportunity to drive a long downhill (Guardsman Pass down into to Park City) and it showed the battery charging the entire way. @FKHeath believes it is a display error and that seems logical, but we were able to drive much further than normal on electricity after reaching the bottom, and after parking with the battery meter showing four bars, this morning on starting showed three bars and the engine started almost immediately after exiting the parking garage whereas we almost always made it some significant distance beyond the parking garage before the ICE starts, including the other times when it also started at three bars. Having gained a decent understanding of battery technology in my six years of electric car ownership, those would be considered signs of battery duress.

When we get home, I'm going to see if the Dr. Prius app works with our Rav. It isn't listed as a compatible vehicle unfortunately, but I think the only way to satisfy my curiosity is to be able to see actual battery statistics.
 
Discussion starter · #35 ·
Yeah, the hybrids are already doing this to a degree for sure. I'm just wondering if they could squeeze out even more fuel efficiency by going all-in and really running that engine at or close to optimal load only. I've attached the BSFC chart for the A25A-FKS (close enough to A25A-FXS) below. Lower numbers inside the chart mean less fuel used per unit of power generated. I think the chart makes it quite obvious why an engine tackling steep uphills at 2500 RPM and high power requirement and then turning off for downhills is able to outdo the economy of an engine moving the vehicle on flats at steady 1500 RPM and low power.

View attachment 198868
Here's a post I made some time ago with a screen capture of basically the same graph though the curves are slightly different, and showing efficiency as a percentage.

 
You forget that it may not be desirable to run the ICE at peak efficiency all the time. When going up a steep hill, you may need more power to maintain speed, thus the ICE must raise RPM which will take it out of the peak efficiency area. ( HP = torque x RPM). If you stayed at the peak efficiency region, the car would slow down doing up a hill due to insufficient HP. Nobody is going to put up with that.

I think the car's computer does a marvelous job at trying to get the most MPG under the conditions demanded by the driver.
That's of course true but a bit beside my point - which was that the car seems to achieve its highest fuel efficiency in hilly terrain and I can't think of any other explanation than the engine getting to run in its high-efficiency region to a higher degree than on flats. But maybe there's some other mechanism that explains it, interested to hear if you've got ideas.

Also don't forget that, especially in ECO mode, the car actually tries to coax the driver to slow down for steep uphills. Turns out you really should put up with that if you aim for optimal economy!

The hope is that there are enough times when there is extra power available while maintaining the ICE within the efficiency band to charge the battery, and there is enough charge in the battery to provide the needed extra power without needed to exceed the efficiency band.

But, as you stared, there will be times where there is a longer climb that depletes the battery and the ICE must provide all the power needed, regardless of the efficiency band. Undulating hills could be ideal, while an extended continuous steep climb would be bad (for efficiency).
Exactly so!
 
Discussion starter · #37 ·
According to the chart I posted, the engine has a peak efficiency of 39.8% when making around 125 kw or 167 HP. That's a lot of power and more than I would expect to be used other than in high speed climbing up a freeway mountain pass.

But the 38% efficiency window is pretty large, reachable with an output as low as around 80 kw or 107 HP. The reduction in aerodynamic losses going from 167 HP to 107 HP would more than make up for the loss of about 6% thermodynamic efficiency. It's why I think a larger battery, that can more easily absorb extra power in low demand situations and allow the ICE to operate only when power levels closer to the 38% efficiency window are needed, can provide bigger gains than chasing that last few percemnt of thermodynamic efficiency.
 
While on our first road trip in our 2023 XLE hybrid with the NiMH battery, we've encountered several instances of the limitations of the hybrid system in recovering energy in mountainous terrain. Our experience wasn't something I read about in scouring this forum, and while it would have been a factor in the purchase decision, I think it's pretty likely we would have ended up with a Rav4 hybrid anyway. My wife and I are both very satisfied with the performance, comfort, and efficiency of our Rav. I want to leave this here so other potential owners can be fully informed.

When descending an extended and steep downhill of three or more miles, the hybrid battery will become fully charged and at that time, a few things will happen.

First, the Rav becomes unable to operate in EV mode. The EV mode light turns off, and pressing the EV button generates a message that EV mode is unavailable.

Second, the ICE engine spins up. I'm not sure if there is fuel going to the engine or if it is just being spun up to provide additional drag with fuel flow shut off. When this happens and the engine is not at full operating temperature, the engine coolant gauge will show the engine continues to get warmer. I had one instance where on a cold engine, we descended a six mile grade where the battery filled up halfway down but by the time we reached the bottom, the coolant was at normal full operating temp. However, when I turned off the Rav near the bottom of the grade, the MID showed a trip fuel economy of 99.9 MPG, which if accurate means there was no fuel used that entire time.

Third, even after the battery is full and EV mode becomes disabled, the MID still shows energy going to the battery. I believe this might be true, and I have a suspicion this may not good for the hybrid battery. What I noticed is that during an extended downhill that lasted several miles beyond the point where the hybrid battery became full, I was able to drive on the level ground for more than four miles in EV mode before the ICE kicked in. In another instance, I descended only the bottom part of that hill and hit the same level area with the battery having just gone to eight bars, and was only able to drive for three miles before the ICE came on. Both drives in EV mode were at the same speed and in almost identical conditions.

It is what happens after this supercharging of the battery that is a bit concerning. The next one or two times after a supercharging incident when the Rav is parked for an hour or more, the hybrid battery shows a lower charge state when restarted than it had when it was parked, typically by one but occasionally two bars. After a couple of drive cycles, this behavior goes away. We have an electric car and in instances where the charge state drops when parked, it is primarily due to the battery management system rebalancing the cells because of inconsistent voltage among the individual cells that may indicate an imminent cell failure or from repeated high current charging/discharging. Oue electric car has a Lithium ion battery so it may not be directly comparable to the NiMH in our XLE but this odd behavior isn't confidence inspiring.

We've got a long warranty on our hybrid battery so if it fails within ten years, Toyota will be on the hook for it.

Again, I just want other potential hybrid owners to be aware that very mountainous terrain will exceed the limitations of the hybrid system in ways that limit recovering recovery and generate symptoms which may indicate conditions that might shorten the lifetime of the hybrid battery.
Yes, this is normal operation. I didn't read all the replies but here is my 2 cents.

I just did a long trip out west and experienced the same operation. Going on a long downhill the HV Battery would get charged to the maximum. Actually, at about 80% of battery full the ICE would start. This is pretty much similar to downshifting when going downhill in a regular ICE car. Toyota is using the engine as a brake so the wheel brakes don't overheat. It's actually called engine braking.

Engine braking uses very little gas since the throttle is nearly completely closed. The vacuum in the engine manifold and cylinders provide negative torque through the transmission to the wheels. The good news is you use little gas when going downhill with engine braking.

However, the bad thing for us hybrid owners is that once the HV battery is fully charged no more energy is recovered going downhill. So, all that additional energy spent climbing the big hill or mountain gets thrown away. :( (Dissipated by heat)

I don't have a Prime but the larger capacity HV battery should help the Prime recover more of the downhill energy. My sister in Colorado has a Volt and it actually has a "Mountain" setting. What this would do is use the ICE to try to keep the HV battery at about 50%. I think the Volt HV battery is about 14 KWhr vs. 1.6 KWhr for the R4H. So the car would have battery power to help it up the long inclines and more space to absorb energy on the long downhills. The Volt, however is a series hybrid and the ICE isn't mechanically connected to the transmission and wheels so you can't "engine brake" a Volt.
 
All of this has been understood and discussed for decades over at the big Prius forum. The ops observations are off a little, the battery does not over or supercharge, it just uses its reserve capacity before non-fueled engine braking happens.

Driven Ev alone is not allowed over ~40 mph regardless of battery charge state, it is a limitation of the transaxle’s requirement to avoid over rpm of mg1. “Ev” in charge engine off mode at speed is normal and frequent.

You have to get a Prime for improved engineering enabled by a huge battery.
 
Discussion starter · #40 ·
All of this has been understood and discussed for decades over at the big Prius forum. The ops observations are off a little, the battery does not over or supercharge, it just uses its reserve capacity before non-fueled engine braking happens.

Driven Ev alone is not allowed over ~40 mph regardless of battery charge state, it is a limitation of the transaxle’s requirement to avoid over rpm of mg1. “Ev” in charge engine off mode at speed is normal and frequent.

You have to get a Prime for improved engineering enabled by a huge battery.
Except that the battery behavior differs subsequent to an overcharging incident in a way that in my other BEV has been strongly correlated with battery stress. Yes, I understand that Toyota has a history of being very conservative in its battery management. I am just wondering if this situation is an edge case Toyota may not have anticipated.

The cutoff for EV only operation appears to be around 80 MPH. I have been able to slowly accelerate from a stop to well beyond 40 MPH on battery only. Invoking EV mode produces a warning mesage once I exceed about 25 MPH so it's less useful than not using it.
 
21 - 40 of 62 Posts