Toyota RAV4 Forums banner
1 - 20 of 50 Posts

Turbomatic

· Registered
Joined
·
448 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I was looking at the intake setup on the Rav4 v6 yesterday. I was also looking at the K&N apollo intake I bought for a project that did not work out.

A quick review of the piping on the Rav4 intake shows that the air actually comes through only one source. The pipe connects to the bottom of the box the airfilter sits in. It then runs down and splits into both a resonator box and a pipe that curves back up into the fender and sucks air from the engine bay/fender (so stock you are only getting hot air for the most part).

What is interesing and makes my decision to play with the setup is that the resonator box and the split feed pipe for the air are both connected to the box via a shorter straight pipe section. This allows for ease of installation/removal in three pieces. What is even better is that the short straight pipe ends right at the bottom of the engine bay where it connects to the resonator that sits in the fenderwell.

It took no time at all to remove the resonator and air intake pipe from the fenderwell. total of 4 10mm bolts hold everything in. You have to partially take apart the fender lining, another 4 bolts, a few clips and a nut. Need to remove the driver side wheel to make space.

At this point you have just a straight pipe from the airbox to the fenderwell left. It is popped into the air box (I will get to that later) and is otherwise sucking air directly from a colder source than the curved feed pipe was.

Now it is a simple matter to use a coupling to attach the K&N airfilter to that pipe. This is now a cold air intake setup.

The stock airbox has a restrictive filter in it. However, since you now have a highflow filter before the air enters the box, there is no need for that filter anymore. By removing the filter you are essentially leaving a expansion charge box for the air coming in. The thing is you will need to line the edge of the box with a gasket or foam padding to seal it from the outside air to avoid leaking hot air and dust in (My solution I have in mind is to cut the old filter up and leave its outer edge as the seal). You will also need to brace the intake and pipe because it is plugged into the box loosely. Again a rubber gasket of sorts and in my case duct tape and zipties did the job fine as a temporary solution. I can see a simple home depot brace can be made to use the stock mounting holes for the resonator and feed pipe.

The end result is essentially what the Cold air intakes like the Typhoon is trying to accomplish while keeping all stock plastic pipe and intake track up to the throttle body. I prefer this because the whole system is abs plastic and not as subject to heat soak and you are not affecting the MAF area.

The test was today when my wife took it out. No cel, no issue with funny running but of course no proof it did improve any performance either. I will get to romp on it tomorrow since I have to take it to the shop for brake pads.

What would be really nice is to have a before and after dyno with intake temperatures logged. I can easily simulate the different setups by simply reinstalling the stock filter, remove the Apollo, do a run and then reverse and do a run. Hard part will be getting the car from my wife for the day.

I know this thread is worthless without pics. I will work on getting some this coming few days.
 
Nice explanation, pics would be nice.

Would need to see some quantitative data to see if this actually works.

In most cases the stock airbox only flows so much air itself, airbox design is usually a restriction. In many vehicles, running no air filter (not recommended of course) or a high flow air filter in the air box nets negligible or no gains. In your case, you have not eliminated the stock air box...so I wouldn't think you are flowing any more CFM than stock.
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
i will not get to take pics today due to rain and the fact that I had a case come up that forced me to reschedule the brake service.

I will take some detailed pics once weather lets up and I get some time.

The feed pipe from the stock airbox is very restrictive with bends and kinks but the short section is at least 2.5 inch. The pipe coming after the stock filter box into the manifold seems like its at least 2 inch. So I should have taken out two restrictions in the system, 1. the stock snorkle and 2. the stock filter. I am no engineer though so lets see what the dyno says.

I probably won't even get on the dyno for a week or two though due to work.
 
The feed pipe from the stock airbox is very restrictive with bends and kinks but the short section is at least 2.5 inch. The pipe coming after the stock filter box into the manifold seems like its at least 2 inch. So I should have taken out two restrictions in the system, 1. the stock snorkle and 2. the stock filter. I am no engineer though so lets see what the dyno says.
I doubt toyota engineers overlooked those "restictions". intake flow depends on resonance rather than simple flow (AC vs DC analogy).

the best way to compare is to have sensors datalogged before and after the mod on a controlled drive at the same speed and ambient temp and see if there is a measurable difference in intake air temp and engine effort.
 
Discussion starter · #11 ·
The filter element is very tough. I removed it tonight to make my box gasket out of the stock air filter. The material is a dense foam/paper type material. I could not cut through the pleats with a scissor so I resorted to using a plier style cutter. Here are some cutaway view of the filter material.

I also want to restate my earlier statement about the snorkle. It is not as restrictive as I initially thought. The pipe is actually pretty decent sized and smooth on the inside. The only thing is the air is coming from inside the engine bay and must take a 180 degree turn to get to the stock box. I still think the direct route from inside the fenderwell will improve the temperature and flow but we shall see.

Image


Image


Image
 
Discussion starter · #12 ·
I took some cell phone pics real quick this morning. Its not the clearest of pics but it shows what stock stuff was removed. The Apollo connected. And the dash after two days of driving with no cel.

Snorkle and resonator
Image


Looking stock if you don't look for the new filter
Image


Apollo in fenderwell connected to the stock ABS pipe for the intake box.
Image


Another angle

Image
 
Question if I may, from where you are going to feed the Apollo filter with cold air. I guess, and in my humble opinion, if you feed it with a blast of cold air from the front, like the filter was design. Dude, your going to see, feel and be witness to some great high speed and torque, trust me. :wink:

 
Discussion starter · #16 ·
Here are photos (in the thread about photos/videos of aftermarket intakes) of my setup using a Weapon R/Apollo combination. Notice the photo at the bottom, pointing out how the factory routed air towards the inner fender where the air box is?

http://www.rav4world.com/forums/99-...9-4-3-mechanical/74690-pics-vids-air-intakes-installed-v6-i4-35.html#post835331
I just figured that out last night too. Its the exact location the filter is sitting near. I did not route the hose as in your photos but the intake should be getting cooler air than stock. On a another note the gas Milage reading is all screwed up now. I am showing average of 14.3 MPG but I will calculate based on actual miles used at fill ups to see if it it true or just false readings.
 
I see cold air intake mod is nothing but a waste of time, drop in MPG and very minimal performance gain. Most of the OEM intake on newer cars are very well engineer to begin with. The stock intake in the rav4 actually has a flap that varies the opening of the intake duct opening depending on how much throttle input you're putting into the car.
 
I see cold air intake mod is nothing but a waste of time, drop in MPG and very minimal performance gain. Most of the OEM intake on newer cars are very well engineer to begin with. The stock intake in the rav4 actually has a flap that varies the opening of the intake duct opening depending on how much throttle input you're putting into the car.
Tell me avs, aha, how many intake mods have you done to your RAV4 or any vehicle for that matter?
 
I see cold air intake mod is nothing but a waste of time, drop in MPG and very minimal performance gain. Most of the OEM intake on newer cars are very well engineer to begin with. The stock intake in the rav4 actually has a flap that varies the opening of the intake duct opening depending on how much throttle input you're putting into the car.
That's it, I'm removing my cold air intake. This guy may be on to something. :wall
 
1 - 20 of 50 Posts