I see so many people make comments like this. "95% of CUV owners never take their vehicle offroad". I'll speak for myself, but I imagine some other people are in the same boat. Having some ground clearance is nice for snow, and light offroading. I'm not talking rock crawling, but the Rav4 doesn't have THAT much clearance anyways. Some people also enjoy being a little higher off the ground. I also don't have to worry as much hitting my front bumper on steep driveways, or scraping curbs parking.Why do you need ground clearance? I'd rather have an extra 20mpg. Something like 95 percent of CUV owners never take their CUVs offroad
I'm in the 5% that do drive offroad on primitive roads during hunting season, I scraped bottom in my '16 Ltd HV occasionally with 7" ground clearance.Why do you need ground clearance? I'd rather have an extra 20mpg. Something like 95 percent of CUV owners never take their CUVs offroad
I understand completely. I also understand that from an engineering standpoint that CUVs are inefficient and packaged poorly. Minivans offer far more space and packaging efficiency hands down. CUVs dont, period.I see so many people make comments like this. "95% of CUV owners never take their vehicle offroad". I'll speak for myself, but I imagine some other people are in the same boat. Having some ground clearance is nice for snow, and light offroading. I'm not talking rock crawling, but the Rav4 doesn't have THAT much clearance anyways. Some people also enjoy being a little higher off the ground. I also don't have to worry as much hitting my front bumper on steep driveways, or scraping curbs parking.
You might read those reasons, and that doesn't make sense to you, but everyone has different tastes. some people might not NEED the extra clearance, but it is convenient.
A CUV without ground clearance is called a sedan. Literally. The modern CUV is a fwd car with a bit of a lift, hence the came Crossover Utility vehicle. The whole point of paying more for a CUV is to get the height.Why do you need ground clearance? I'd rather have an extra 20mpg. Something like 95 percent of CUV owners never take their CUVs offroad
I sort of agree with some of the points you made, although we are a bit offtopic from ground clearance. We own a Honda Odyssey. I never thought we would own a van, but truth is they have the space of a larger SUV but more fuel efficient. The challenge with the Toyota Sienna is that it is the ONLY AWD minivan, so they sell quick here, and as a result sellers are less inclined to make deals. Can you elaborate what you mean in regards to CUVs are inefficient vs Minivans? the AWD Sienna gets 20MPG combined, while an AWD rav4 gets 29 MPG combined.I understand completely. I also understand that from an engineering standpoint that CUVs are inefficient and packaged poorly. Minivans offer far more space and packaging efficiency hands down. CUVs dont, period.
That is a relative statement. The Rav4 compared to most sedans, or the mazda cx-5 is pretty roomy. Most people know that the Rav4 compared to something like the Sienna isn't AS roomy.It's funny how people say how roomy and how much storage the rav4 has.
What numbers are you comparing? A CUV vs Minivan, or AWD Sedans? You could also make the same claim about America's love for Trucks. How many people actually tow with their Truck? How many people go off road with their truck? Many women buy trucks, and don't intend on towing, off roading etc. You could say this is irrational, but buying a vehicle for many people isn't strictly "what is the most rational purchase."America's love affair with the CUV is totally irrational. Any engineer has to agree, the numbers don't lie.