Toyota RAV4 Forums banner
1 - 7 of 291 Posts
I took my 2020 RAV4 hybrid to the dealer for checking the corroded cable problem. The car didn’t show any messages on the screen.
the technician came back in 45 minutes telling me there is lots of corrosion of the cable, the car failed their tests. Cable need change. They told me they will order parts from Toyota which will take couple of weeks. Toyota will cover all. Car is out of 3 years warranty.
It is really unfortunate that a 3 year old car has a significant problem like this. Toyota should have designed this cable connection away from snow and salt !
is the new design / replacement better? Will the problem happen again in 3 years?
Toyota has extended the warranty for the 2019-2022 models, which is a good thing. The design is flawed beyond stupid.
I had a chance to examine a failed one the other day. From my perspective there are two causes of failure ( both of which present with the same two fault codes), the first is in the design of the lower male portion of the connector on the motor. Which is completely encased by a plastic housing. Water,small sand/salt can easily infiltrate this split plastic housing and then be sandwiched inside where the radio frequency shield is and of course the HV cables.

The second is the infiltration into the actual aluminium hub of the female portion of the connector.

In the first case of the male portion of the connector, it appeared to have experienced corrosion/freezing of water. In the example I saw the male aluminium case had actually cracked from freezing, and the plastic housing was bulged due to dirt, freezing and corrosion.

While I have not seen examples of the female portion failing, I have seen a video of it, in the other thread that is now locked.

I did order a 2022 Rav, but due to production limits I have the 23 model now. I do not know if there is a real fix yet to the new modified cable. The techs I spoke to are not sure, since the only difference in appearance is the new cable has a cut out on the plastic cover on the male portion of the connector.

When I put on my "thinking hat", I can see how the cut out may help to eliminate the issue of the male connector building up with water/dirt and salt, but the issue of migration of salt/water into the female housing could occur. I do think the issue on the female connection point is one of poor materials of the internal rubber gasket.

The connector I saw, even though it was the male end that failed, the rubber on the female connector was shrunken and cracked. It has slipped right off the male portion and was kind of just sitting inside the female housing. I hope on the replacement cable, they addressed this rubber gasket. Perhaps the original was of poor quality, and didn't have the same expansion/contraction rates as the aluminium housing it is seated in?

Time will tell if this a fix, or if failures will keep occurring and the warranty extension will also happen on the 2023 models as well.

I should also add,that the replacement is of the entire harness components. Including the harness above that connects into the electric motor. But given the past life time of the original cable, if there was not a major redesign , that only gives the average snow/salt/winter drivers two years or so.
 
I live in Canada, Saskatchewan where lots snow Nov till May. I keep the car in garage where temp is 5 c in winter. Outside in winter could reach -40. I don’t know if melting snow makes this problem happens faster. Yes, they use salt in the area where I live !
Northern Ontario here, they use raw salt, two types of salt sprays and 2% salt/sand mixes. Depending upon what type of surface treatments are needed. They may even be trying beat juice in a few spots as well.

Lots of cold and winter is 10 months long, with 2 months of poor sledding ....
 
Has Toyota issued a public statement saying they were extending the warranties of all 2019-2022 RAV4 Hybrids specifically for the H/V cable issue? If so could you post a link for that statement from Toyota. Thanks!
as far as certain vehicles
CUSTOMER SUPPORT PROGRAM 22TE09


Certain 2019 – 2022 Model Year Rav4 HV (AWD Only)
Coverage for HV Floor Under Wire Harness and Rear Traction Motor Cable Corrosion

Model / Years Production Period Approximate Total Vehicles
2019 – 2022 Rav4 HV AWD Mid-August 2018 – Mid-November 2022 437,140


Covered Vehicles
There are approximately 473,100 vehicles covered by this Customer Support Program.
There are 3,400 vehicles in Puerto Rico involved in this Customer Support Program.



Customers with additional questions or concerns are asked to please contact the Toyota Brand Engagement Center (1-888-270-9371) - Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 8:00 pm, Saturday 9:00 am to 7:00 pm Eastern Time.

This is for Canada, not sure it applies in the US.
 
"Q4: Which and how many vehicles are covered by this Customer Support Program?
A4: There are approximately 437,100 vehicles covered by this Customer Support Program.

Model Name Model Year Production Period Rav4 HV (AWD Only) 2019-2022 Mid-August 2018 – Mid-November 2022"

thought some might find this interesting as I did...
also answers a question about the 2023

Why inclusive dates ? 🤔
I have a suspicion it might be a supply chain thing. I don't know this for sure, but I have a thought there may have been more than one supplier of these harness. If so,it may only be cables from one supplier failing. Still that doesn't make up any excuse for a poor overall design of the harness.
 
Also could answer why if a cable is replaced, its not expected to have to be replaced again...

As to design, my thoughts ...

Toyota has used the same basic design for many years in different formats, with little to no complaints about corrosion. If not for the corrosion most would not even be aware of this cable as with other vehicles having similar cables in earlier years..
On the above point, your correct, the issue is more on where they moved the connection point to. It is now exposed to "road conditions" much more than when it was mounted up above. That is one reason why I think they added in the plastic cover. For more robust protection against impact from small rocks etc being thrown up in the area.

But , and this is my criticism of the design, there was no need to put it there. Why change a design location which has worked well in the past? Unless there is a manufacturing advantage, it would have been fine up top, and I am sure they could have incorporated the entry point to still be in the spare tire well.

Anyhow it is all speculation on our part, none of use were on the design team!! I do hope it is resolved. I have really enjoyed my experience with the RAV4. It's my third Toyota vehicle, and first new one from them. ( been a Ford F-150 buyer in the past).
 
1 - 7 of 291 Posts