I believe that they are.
If you look at MSRP and invoice pricing, it is pretty universal that as price goes up, the invoice price increases by less than the MSRP does, giving dealers more profit and/or room to discount the selling price.
For example, the base price on the hybrid XLE is $1800 more that the LE. The Invoice price goes up $1692, meaning that the dealer has $108 more profit (or can give more discount) on the XLE. The same holds true for option packages, accessories, etc.
When comparing Rav4 hybrid to non hybrid invoice prices, the opposite happens.
For the hybrid LE, XLE and Limited, the MSRP is $800 more than the comparable non hybrid.
For each of those $800 MSRP increases, the invoice price increases even more reducing the profit margin. For the LE the invoice price goes up by $886, reducing profit by $86. For the XLE the increase is $895 and for the Limited it is $926.
End result? Most likely, even after the initial rush is over, dealers will continue to ask more than $800 for a comparably equipped hybrid over a non hybrid. Toyota should be more transparent about this and reflect it in the MSRP.
Of course there are factors that we customers don't have access to such as "holdback" and other rebates that dealers receive but a salesman told me that they have to charge more that the $800 to make the same profit and I believe that he was being honest.
I welcome any challenges to my math and conclusions. The figures are consistent on sites like Edmunds and Costco.
If you look at MSRP and invoice pricing, it is pretty universal that as price goes up, the invoice price increases by less than the MSRP does, giving dealers more profit and/or room to discount the selling price.
For example, the base price on the hybrid XLE is $1800 more that the LE. The Invoice price goes up $1692, meaning that the dealer has $108 more profit (or can give more discount) on the XLE. The same holds true for option packages, accessories, etc.
When comparing Rav4 hybrid to non hybrid invoice prices, the opposite happens.
For the hybrid LE, XLE and Limited, the MSRP is $800 more than the comparable non hybrid.
For each of those $800 MSRP increases, the invoice price increases even more reducing the profit margin. For the LE the invoice price goes up by $886, reducing profit by $86. For the XLE the increase is $895 and for the Limited it is $926.
End result? Most likely, even after the initial rush is over, dealers will continue to ask more than $800 for a comparably equipped hybrid over a non hybrid. Toyota should be more transparent about this and reflect it in the MSRP.
Of course there are factors that we customers don't have access to such as "holdback" and other rebates that dealers receive but a salesman told me that they have to charge more that the $800 to make the same profit and I believe that he was being honest.
I welcome any challenges to my math and conclusions. The figures are consistent on sites like Edmunds and Costco.