OK, guys from RAV4.2 I need some info.
Which RAV4.2 model came with Rear disc Brakes?
Which RAV4.2 model came with Rear disc Brakes?
mensajero
2001 to 2005 Which RAV4 came with REAR disc Brakes
2003
2003, not entirely true; unless the Rav4 is a 2004 model made in 2003 then yes.
Drum:
2001-03 (
![Image]()
2003 Toyota RAV4 Base 4dr SUV 2.0L 4-cyl. 5-speed Manual Features and Specs)
Disk:
2004 (
![Image]()
2004 Toyota RAV4 Base 4dr SUV 2.4L 4-cyl. 5-speed Manual Features and Specs)
2005 (
![Image]()
2005 Toyota RAV4 Base 4dr SUV 2.4L 4-cyl. 5-speed Manual Features and Specs)
Just to make it simple, 04-05 models have rounded fog lights. They're the ones with disc.
http://www.edmunds.com/toyota/rav4/?sub=suv&ps=used
Drum:
2001-03 (
Disk:
2004 (
2005 (
Just to make it simple, 04-05 models have rounded fog lights. They're the ones with disc.
http://www.edmunds.com/toyota/rav4/?sub=suv&ps=used
Well it was available in the USA, according to ToyoDIY.com data. I'm doing the research for new parts for 2003 and the numbers, and years, are giving me results.
Pricey, yes, but brakes are something that are non-negotiable. your life depends on them. But if you go with an aftermarket kit. It can go into the 1K+ range easy.
BTW, guys, thank for chipping in. Every time you post something I quickly check it.
Pricey, yes, but brakes are something that are non-negotiable. your life depends on them. But if you go with an aftermarket kit. It can go into the 1K+ range easy.
BTW, guys, thank for chipping in. Every time you post something I quickly check it.
your life depends upon them?
rear brakes do little to stop, nice to have rear discs, but it's not a deal breaker
rear brakes do little to stop, nice to have rear discs, but it's not a deal breaker
You can noticeably feel the difference between rear drums and rear discs. I think it's a bit more costly to have rear discs, but again what's a lil money if it potentially saves your life. Mens, I'd be interested to know if 01-03 actually had an 'option' for rear disc, should I want to upgrade in the future.
According to this archive of sales brochures, the rear disc brakes were first introduced in the 2004 model year. They were not available even as an option before then:
Toyota RAV4 Touchup Paint Codes, Image Galleries, Brochure and TV Commercial Archives
Toyota RAV4 Touchup Paint Codes, Image Galleries, Brochure and TV Commercial Archives
My dad used to own a 2001 rav4 down here. I am 100% positive that it had rear disc brakes. I was the top of line with, 4WD, moonroof, and other features I don't remember right now.
it is possible that the first year(2001) rear discs were optional, car makers sometimes drop or add options, but I can say with certainty rear discs were not available on a 2003 model, I researched the options well and had to wait about 2 months to get the car I wanted.
and when I replaced my front pads, I also looked at the rear drums, they appeared to have a lot of life left, if rear brakes are so important why do the rear drum last so much longer than the front disc?
It would be interesting to know the difference in stopping distance of a rear drum to rear disc RAV4, I am guessing it is on the order of a meter or less, stopping from 60mph.
and when I replaced my front pads, I also looked at the rear drums, they appeared to have a lot of life left, if rear brakes are so important why do the rear drum last so much longer than the front disc?
It would be interesting to know the difference in stopping distance of a rear drum to rear disc RAV4, I am guessing it is on the order of a meter or less, stopping from 60mph.
I have a 2002 2.0 petrol sport ( 5 door ) and it has rear disc brakes!? I thought only the frontwheel drive rav with the 1.8 engine had brakedrums in the back?
Was this a trick question?
I don't get it :shrug: you are in Puerto Rico, I don't see what difference how cars came to other countries unless you plan on importing them. Seems that would be kinda spendy. Would make more sense just to buy the parts and convert.
I would still like to see data on stopping distances for rear brake models. I doubt there is much difference, although I suppose if you are racing, the disc won't suffer fade as bad. But racing a RAV4, ... don't get me started.
I don't get it :shrug: you are in Puerto Rico, I don't see what difference how cars came to other countries unless you plan on importing them. Seems that would be kinda spendy. Would make more sense just to buy the parts and convert.
I would still like to see data on stopping distances for rear brake models. I doubt there is much difference, although I suppose if you are racing, the disc won't suffer fade as bad. But racing a RAV4, ... don't get me started.
you have a chili edition but rear drums? no freakin way. can you post a pic of your rear wheels? i just want to make sure.
to each their own
I autocross and have thought of running my RAV, there is a guy locally that has run a Juke. A Rav4 may not even be legal for an SCCA event, I haven't bothered to check beyond doing a search of their forum which yielded no results so I assumed nobody is doing it probably because it isn't a legal vehicle (based on height to width). Also, changing the rear to disc might move you to a more highly competitive class.
My experience tells me that a rear disc on a RAV is not going to make a bit of difference unless you are competing at the national level where hundredths of a second are important. For a local event, especially for someone with less than 3-4 years experience, it ain't gonna make a bit of difference. Runs are only a minute long, sometimes as little as 1/2 a minute, then car sits for about 15 minutes. Brake fade isn't much of an issue, and the extra stopping of a rear disc isn't significant enough unless you are a very experienced driver. JMO
update: looks like there is a guy in Houston running a RAV, upgraded with Brembo's. He lowered his car 3" which would certainly help. but still don't know if they are legal.
I autocross and have thought of running my RAV, there is a guy locally that has run a Juke. A Rav4 may not even be legal for an SCCA event, I haven't bothered to check beyond doing a search of their forum which yielded no results so I assumed nobody is doing it probably because it isn't a legal vehicle (based on height to width). Also, changing the rear to disc might move you to a more highly competitive class.
My experience tells me that a rear disc on a RAV is not going to make a bit of difference unless you are competing at the national level where hundredths of a second are important. For a local event, especially for someone with less than 3-4 years experience, it ain't gonna make a bit of difference. Runs are only a minute long, sometimes as little as 1/2 a minute, then car sits for about 15 minutes. Brake fade isn't much of an issue, and the extra stopping of a rear disc isn't significant enough unless you are a very experienced driver. JMO
update: looks like there is a guy in Houston running a RAV, upgraded with Brembo's. He lowered his car 3" which would certainly help. but still don't know if they are legal.
BTW, does anyone have the latest rule book. SCCA Solo I, if so, pdf it so we can discuss it here.
http://www.scca.com:8080/documents/2011 Tech/2011 SCCA Solo Rules.pdf
Look at page 33:wall. But I guess with some modifications it can be permitted.
http://www.scca.com:8080/documents/2011 Tech/2011 SCCA Solo Rules.pdf
Look at page 33:wall. But I guess with some modifications it can be permitted.
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
